The comparison that matters
is not about features. It is about jurisdiction.
Microsoft Office, now sold as Microsoft 365, against Office.eu,
the European-hosted suite launched in 2026. Compared plainly,
by a team that operates both.
Microsoft Office no longer exists as a product
you buy once. It is sold as Microsoft 365: Word, Excel,
PowerPoint and Outlook alongside Teams, SharePoint and OneDrive,
on subscription, in Microsoft's cloud. Office.eu launched in
early 2026 as a deliberate alternative. It covers documents,
spreadsheets, presentations, email, calendars, file storage and
video meetings, is built on open-source software, and is
European-owned, running on infrastructure hosted and managed
entirely within the EU.
For most firms, comparing the two on features
misses the point. Both will write a letter, build a spreadsheet
and run a video call, and Office.eu works in the same .docx,
.xlsx and .pptx formats your clients send you. The difference
that matters to a regulated firm is jurisdiction: who owns the
platform, which laws govern it, and where client data actually
sits. Microsoft is a US company, and data held in its cloud can
fall within reach of US law. Office.eu is European-owned and
governed by EU law and GDPR. For a firm that answers to the
FCA, the ICO or a client mandate about where data lives, that
is the comparison worth making.
Side by side
|
Microsoft 365 |
Office.eu |
| What it is |
Microsoft's subscription suite, the successor
to the boxed Microsoft Office licences |
A European-owned cloud office suite, launched
in early 2026, built on open-source software |
| Applications |
Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams,
SharePoint, OneDrive |
Documents, spreadsheets, presentations, email,
calendars, file storage, video meetings |
| How you work |
Installed desktop applications plus web and
mobile |
Through the browser, as a cloud workspace |
| File formats |
Native .docx, .xlsx and .pptx |
Works in the same Microsoft formats |
| Ownership and governing law |
Microsoft Corporation, a US company; data in
its cloud can fall within reach of US law |
European-owned, governed by EU law and GDPR |
| Where data lives |
Microsoft's global cloud, with UK and EU
datacentre regions available |
Infrastructure hosted and managed entirely
within the EU |
| Track record |
Decades of development; integrates with almost
everything a firm already uses |
A young platform with a capable core and a
smaller ecosystem |
| Best fit |
Most UK wealth management and accountancy
firms |
Firms whose data residency obligations or
client mandates require European
jurisdiction |
When Microsoft 365 is the right answer
- Your
regulators and clients are satisfied by UK and EU
datacentre regions and a properly configured tenant,
documented and evidenced
- Your team
depends on the installed desktop applications, or on
tools and integrations that only exist in the Microsoft
ecosystem
- The real
problem is governance rather than geography: most tenants
we assess need bringing under control, not replacing
When Office.eu earns its place
- A data
residency obligation or client mandate requires client
data held under European ownership and jurisdiction, not
just in a European datacentre owned by a US company
- Leadership
wants the office suite governed by EU law and GDPR by
design, rather than by configuration choices that have to
be maintained and evidenced
- The firm
can work in a browser-delivered suite, and the assessment
confirms the integrations it relies on are covered
We are a Microsoft Solutions Partner and we
operate both platforms, so the recommendation is driven by
your obligations, not by what we can sell. The assessment
looks at your data residency obligations, your regulators'
expectations and how your team actually works, and it closes
with a written recommendation before anything moves. Read how
we deliver each platform on the
Microsoft 365 and
Office.eu service pages, or
ask us to assess your position.
faq
Questions leadership teams ask when comparing the two
Yes. Office.eu works in the standard Microsoft
formats, including .docx, .xlsx and .pptx, with
real-time collaborative editing, so documents
continue to move between your firm and its
clients without conversion. Heavily built
spreadsheets and templates should still be
checked before a move, which is one of the
things our assessment covers before any
recommendation is made.
No. Microsoft 365 can be run in a way that
satisfies UK GDPR, with UK and EU datacentre
regions and a documented configuration, and
that is how we run it for most of the firms we
manage. The question some firms face is
narrower than GDPR: a data residency obligation
or client mandate that requires data held under
European ownership and jurisdiction, not just
in a European datacentre owned by a US company.
Those are the firms Office.eu exists for.
It is a young platform. It launched in early
2026 and its third-party ecosystem is smaller
than Microsoft's, while the core suite covers
documents, spreadsheets, presentations, email,
calendars, file storage and video meetings.
Whether that is enough depends on what your
firm actually uses, which is why our assessment
documents how your team works before we
recommend anything. Where a dependency only
exists in the Microsoft ecosystem, we say so
plainly.
Whichever your obligations point to, and we put
that in writing before anything moves. We are a
Microsoft Solutions Partner and we operate both
platforms, so the recommendation is driven by
your obligations, not by what we can sell. Most
assessments end with a recommendation to stay
on Microsoft 365 and bring the tenant under
control. Where a firm has a clear data
residency reason, we recommend Office.eu and
deliver the migration in documented stages with
a rollback point at each one.